I was intrigued by the annual report of the
Gambling Supervision Commission (see
Most of it is pretty dull and inoffensive –
at least for a pointless QUANGO like this, though considering that a large
percentage of what we used to call the Finance Sector is now devoted to online
gambling it is frankly hilarious that it is as badly run as the FSC was before
the OECD demanded better.
However, page 27 IS quite revealing.
Here we learn that:
“All online licence holders are required,
by a condition of their licence, to make a contribution to the Island ’s problem gambling fund. Contributions are collected annually and
the funds are distributed between the Isle of Man Social Services and the GREaT
Foundation, a UK
based charity.
Isle of Man Social Services use these
contributions to fund third sector addiction support agencies which provide
local service and support to those individuals for whom gambling is becoming or
has become a problem. The GREaT Foundation is a UK based organisation that provides
help, support, research and education in the area of problem gambling. The
Commission’s support of this cause has been recognised with the Silver GREaTer
donor award, which stands as testament to the contributions and support provided
by the Island ’s industry
to this highly valued service.”
In other words, as those dependent on alcohol-dependency charities for employment
could not pay themselves, and were the object of open derision even amongst those
who recognise they need professional help (but could not find it because the Manx
government closed down the facilities rather than pay the staff), it was necessary
for their chums in government to find a new scam to subsidise them.
The answer, yet again, came from the UK
government, who had set up Gamcare, a bogus ‘gambling dependency’ operation which
creamed off income from the gambling industry as a condition of licensing and
passed it to ‘therapists’ and ‘counsellors’ who (in theory) help anyone who
thinks they might be getting in too deep to stop gambling.
In practice, it keeps the
new puritans off government backs, which is pretty funny considering that the
puritans are the ones who spread the scare stories in order to set their
churchgoing mates up as ‘third sector therapeutic charities’ in the first
place. Which is exactly what the puritans did in the Isle
of Man , with alcohol, drugs... and other issues of which they lack any
practical, professional or academic knowledge.
If you like, you can see the latest local
Gamcare scam at http://www.energyfm.net/cms/news_story_235878.html
, and to find out more about how the UK is wasting both British money and the money it now creams off us, take a look at http://www.responsiblegamblingtrust.org.uk/index.html
.
So do we have a gambling problem? Probably
no more than anywhere less; in fact we have more chance of winning the lottery than finding evidence of addiction that would stand up.
But do we have a problem with underemployed
parasites needing to justify their public subsidy? Yes.
The money currently creamed off by
government from gambling companies to feed the therapy-giving addiction of a
few disturbed people could equally well go to, say, schools or health.
At most,
only a one-off payment should be used to break their habit. After that, they
really should seek private therapy and pay for it themselves.
We can’t go
subsidising these wasters from the public purse. If gambling
really is annoying the over-sensitive sector of the populace - which I am not
convinced is a large one – then let the gambling industry make some token
annual donations to schools and hospitals and let us be done with the
lecturing.
2 comments:
I read this with some curiosity, it could have been reduced to 'Bah Humbug!'. Or 'a plague on both their houses' the both refering to the gambling industry (calling it anything less would be a lie and perhaps it is the only indutry left... ) and the cause of therapy. Perhaps they damn each other by the industry 'paying for the addicts it sucks in', but why not call the move decsribed here 'privatising therapy'? By making the gambling industry pay for the ready made victims it makes even more into vicitms? Anyone can be a victim, if enough pressure is applied, but the best victims occupy victimhood on very temprary basis, and get out with the least amount of help they need.
Happy Christmas.
I think my (strictly tongue-in-cheek) point here is that taxpayers seem to be feeding the addiction of a growing class of people to offering everybody else advice, but these addicts to giving therapy seem even less capable of holding down a proper job than the poor sods they claim to be helping - just with more friends in government!
I'd more seriously accept there will always be some people who need help with gambling , or alcohol, or drugs...etc. etc.... but seriously, is there any real attempt to provide professional help here?
Sorry, I just have to laugh, but maybe my humour's just too obscure, and maybe that's because I spend more time than is healthy monitoring such insanity.
But Merry Xmas to you too.
Post a Comment