I am bored by so called ‘rationalist’ and ‘secular’ groups
at the moment. In fact the poorly disguised racism and flat-earth thinking
prevalent on even usually sane and witty websites and forums bores me so much I’ve
withdrawn permanently from some and may stop looking in on others until the
nonsense abates.
Inevitably, the sad case of Shafila Ahmed brought out the
bigots in force but then, as a veteran anti-racist, I’ve always known how the
fash and their kissing cousins like to infiltrate and poison the unlikeliest
forums. Sadly, if any well meaning secularist points out, say, a problem caused
by Muslim fundamentalism or orthodox Catholic thinking then it quickly becomes
an invitation for the pub bore to jump in – and when you mention Judaism all
kinds of freaks crawl out of the graveyard of ideas we all thought they’d been
confined to since 1945.
Some years back I was perturbed to see a flat-out UKIP lie
circulated as ‘fact’ in a BHA forum, and more recently names I recognise as
dreary BNP klingons were trying to start ‘skeptic’ and ‘atheist’ groups which –
rather curiously - seemed far more intent on spreading common folk myths about
Islam than exploring their origins and then debunking them along with the religious
mythology they claim to be worried about. When even one of the atheist world’s
best known women academics says she is avoiding some secular conferences after
getting death threats from misogynistic male skeptics you know things are out
of hand.
It rather proves the point I try to make to such fundamentalists. They assume 'All Muslims are....' (as if every Muslim lives in a tiny closed community with no access to others, and has no interaction within other communities) and also assume 'All atheists are...' (as if every atheist was also a non-racist, non-sexist, non-homophobic progressive liberal, when every second comment on every secular website shows that all they have in common is a professed disbelief in the supernatural, while the vast majority are all too willing to swallow whole the most common folk myths about every sector of society).
Still, I hadn’t realised just how bad things were until I
sent a jokey response in to a NSS Newsline item concerning a Revelation Channel
report on Mitt Romney's visit to Israel, in which it was claimed that he
mentions Israel a lot because "Israel is mentioned in the Bible more than
any other country".
Things, I should explain, have been a bit dull on Newsline
recently. The stories from the two producers are as sharp and relevant as ever,
but they invite reader letters in response, and I suspected they have been
ready to slash their wrists at the drivel from non-religious ‘Disgusted of
Tunbridge Wells’ types which have featured in recent months. So, tongue-in-cheek,
I pointed out that “Reliable sources insist that the State of Israel came into
being on 14th May 1948”, and that if he “is correct, (and as a deeply religious
man and avid Bible-reader running for the most powerful job on earth surely he
must be)” I wondered “would Mr. Romney accept that the Gutenberg Bible, all
such historical Bibles held in museums around the world, and all those Bibles
passed down for centuries and so solemnly read on Sundays in our nation's best
known churches must be forgeries?”
I readily admit I do this every few months on NSS and other forums
to draw out and wind up the flat-earthers. Anyone who knows me well can testify
that when asked in interviews for my hobbies I always reply “Winding up
fundamentalists until they explode”, so my refusal to take ‘serious’ topics,
well….seriously is hardly a state secret. I picked up the idea from the late Robert
Anton Wilson, who worried about ‘the New Inquisition’ – those who create a
scientific orthodoxy that can no more be questioned than a mediaeval pope – and
thought that the best way to draw attention to a ludicrous failure to approach
things with an open mind was to poke fun with a very straight face. Usually it
works, and I get a few e-mails from friends who had a giggle, but this time not
just one but two herberts who probably think they are models of sane and sober
rationality replied to Newsline trying to ‘correct’ my ‘mistake’ about the
birth of Israel.
DUH!!! (Bangs head on desk in stunned disbelief before falling
off the chair shrieking with laughter). It’s tempting to reply in turn asking
if there’s an e-mail equivalent of the ‘SATIRE’ sign that used to flash on and
off during Monty Python sketches, but is there much point?
So, all a bit sad, and by comparison I heartily recommend
you read the reply sent to a BNP pamphleteer by one Dick Wolff, who describes
himself as a United Reformed Church minister and Green Party
councillor for Oxford City. You can read it at http://dickwolffblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/got-sent-bnp-pamphlet-today.html
and I think the sane and humane attitude expressed will make your day, as it
did mine. Mr. Wolff may be a believer in things I cannot rationally accept as
true, but is certainly someone I would be glad to count as a friend - unlike the
tinfoil-hatters currently crowding to sites I used to think of as refuges for
the purely rational.
No comments:
Post a Comment